How does analysis and optimization of capital structure differ for companies in various stages and with different business models?
Traditionally, companies with tangible assets (asset-heavy) have easier access to funding than those relying on intangible assets (asset-light). But things are changing.
A shift in risk analysis and alternative financing is giving asset-light businesses more funding options. New financing methods allow companies to take on debt earlier, reducing their reliance on equity. These options match the cash flow patterns and growth needs of tech and digital companies, complementing traditional funding sources.
While asset-light companies still face capital structure challenges, new risk assessments and financing solutions are making it easier. By adapting to these changes, companies can secure funding that fits their needs and navigate industry challenges more effectively.
First, let's take a closer look at the core elements of capital structure.
TL;DR
- A company's capital structure relies on debt (borrowed money) or equity (selling shares) to fund its growth.
- The ideal balance depends on business goals – some thrive on debt, others on equity.
- Companies adjust their capital structure based on interest rates, capital costs, and economic conditions.
Definition: What is capital structure?
The capital structure, or capital stack, describes a company's mix of equity (selling shares) and debt (borrowed money). It appears on the liability side of the balance sheet. The capital structure serves as a blueprint for how the company organizes and replenishes its financial reservoirs.
A high proportion of equity generally indicates a good capital structure. The company is financially sound, the assets are backed by equity. Conversely, high liabilities may indicate that the assets do not belong to the company itself, but to third parties (e.g., banks). However, in practice, the evaluation of the capital stack is also based on other factors.
From their capital structure analysis, companies discern the optimizations necessary to enhance appeal to capital providers and reduce capital costs. Financial institutions and investors gauge investment risks and determine terms and conditions based on an evaluation of the capital structure.
Calculation of capital structure
The capital structure is calculated using the following formula: (Equity / Debt) x 100.
It describes the vertical capital structure and compares equity and debt to the total capital of a company.
In contrast, the horizontal capital structure describes whether equity covers fixed assets and debt covers current assets.
Capital structure formula
There are specific formulas for each:
- Horizontal capital structure I = (Equity / Fixed Assets) x 100
- Horizontal capital structure II = (Debt / Current Assets) x 100
Capital structure ratio
Equity Ratio, Debt Ratio, and Debt-to-Equity Ratio: These ratios allow for a deeper analysis of a company's capital structure.
- The equity ratio is calculated as: (Equity / Total capital) x 100
- The debt ratio is calculated as: (Debt / Total capital) x 100
- The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as: (Debt / Equity) x 100
Interested in your funding scenario?
Get access to re:cap and calculate your funding terms or talk to one of our experts to find out how we can help you with our tailored debt funding.
Calculate your funding termsEquity or debt? Understanding capital structures
Every company must decide how to finance its operations and growth, balancing debt and equity to create an optimal capital structure. The right mix depends on various factors, including financial goals, risk tolerance, and market conditions. However, this decision comes with trade-offs that can impact profitability, control, and financial stability.
At the heart of capital structure decisions lies the choice between debt financing and equity financing. Each option has advantages and drawbacks, and companies must weigh them carefully.
The trade-off between financial stability and growth
A company’s capital structure affects its ability to withstand economic downturns and seize growth opportunities.
- High debt levels can lead to financial instability but may drive higher returns if managed efficiently.
- High equity reliance ensures financial security but may dilute ownership and slow decision-making.
- Balanced capital structures leverage the benefits of both debt and equity while mitigating their drawbacks.
Analysis of capital structure
Determining whether a company possesses a favorable or unfavorable capital structure lacks a universal answer. There exists no one-size-fits-all solution or prescribed ratio between debt and equity. Each company necessitates individual scrutiny. The efficacy of capital allocation hinges upon:
- Company goals
- Industry dynamics
- Company stage
In essence, companies, or their CFOs and financing executives, must craft a financing mix that aligns with their strategic objectives at any given juncture, while concurrently fostering financial adaptability and restraining capital costs within reasonable bounds. Consequently, the capital structure is not a static entity but evolves in tandem with a company's progression. Nonetheless, it should embody robust adaptability and resilience.
A prevalent guideline in financing principles revolves around the debt-to-equity ratio, which might be, for instance, 1:1, 2:1, or 3:1. Any deviation from the target ratio prompts the need for optimizations.

Impact of the business phase on the capital structure
The influence of the business phase on the capital structure is significant. Before a company builds its capital stack, it must secure suitable access to capital. The range of options for procuring debt or equity capital shapes the capital structure.
Let's look at capital allocation. Investors analyze a company's risk profile to determine the likelihood of getting their investment repaid. Equity financing typically entails a higher risk profile, translating to greater potential for higher returns compared to debt financing. Consequently, equity tends to be more costly than debt.

Early stage: one-sided capital structure
During the early stages, companies grapple with numerous uncertainties such as hiring, product development, and market penetration, thus bearing higher investment risks. Given their elevated risk profile, typically characterized by a high-risk, high-return dynamic, equity capital emerges as the primary avenue to fortify their capital structure.
Growth phase: more flexibility
For companies that have passed this early stage and are generating regular revenues, the capital structure may look different. While equity remains foundational, the inclusion of debt financing becomes viable. This initial diversification of the capital structure diminishes reliance on a singular capital source, affording the company greater latitude in allocating various types of capital to different investments.
Established companies: various options
Established firms boasting a robust customer base and stable revenues enjoy a multitude of options. They can self-finance investments from internal resources or tap into external capital providers. Accessing loans from banks becomes more feasible, and depending on their legal structure, they may even venture into refinancing endeavors within the capital market.
Impact of the business model on the capital structure
Capital allocation and, consequently, the structure of capital are not solely contingent on the company's stage of development. Another pivotal aspect is the business model and the collateral associated with it.
Companies endowed with physical assets such as real estate, machinery, or fleets typically find themselves in a position to integrate debt into their capital structure at an earlier stage. The risk assessment of traditional banks and financial institutions are tailored around these tangible assets. Such business models are often categorized as "asset-heavy."
"Asset-light" or "Asset-heavy" affects the capital structure
For companies with an "asset-light" business model, the landscape is notably different. Unlike their counterparts with tangible assets, they lack physical assets to serve as collateral. Instead, their collateral is intangible assets such as software products, customer contracts, and recurring revenues.
This distinctive form of collateral places them beyond the purview of traditional debt providers' risk assessments. Traditional lenders struggle to evaluate such intangible assets, often leading to reluctance in extending debt capital to "asset-light" business models.

Consequently, the accessibility of debt capital becomes a challenge for tech- and digital-savvy companies. They find themselves less able to incorporate debt into their capital structure and thus rely more heavily on equity financing, necessitating the sale of company shares.
New approaches in risk analysis
To effectively assess the risks associated with such business models, novel risk analysis methodologies and a reevaluation of the risk-return profile are imperative. These modern approaches are founded on daily-calculated data and tailored metrics. Modern debt providers prioritize insights into revenues, cash flows, accounting practices, and customer bases to make informed lending decisions.
One groundbreaking aspect of these new risk approaches is the provision of access to debt financing at earlier stages of a tech company's lifecycle. Historically, they have primarily relied on equity financing due to the perceived riskiness of their ventures. Yet, by utilizing sophisticated risk assessment models, modern funding providers can offer debt tailored to the specific needs and risk profiles of asset-light businesses, enabling them to access capital more efficiently.
Moreover, these innovative risk assessment approaches enable tech companies to demonstrate their creditworthiness more effectively. By incorporating non-traditional metrics, alternative funding providers can gain a comprehensive understanding of a tech company's growth potential and mitigate perceived risks.
The early access to debt financing afforded by these new risk assessment methodologies empowers tech companies to diversify their funding sources and optimize their capital structure strategically.
How to optimize capital structure
For a company to even be in a position to optimize its capital structure, it also depends on the factors mentioned above. However, when the optimization of the capital structure is on the table, it can proceed in the following steps:

1. Analysis of the current situation
The initial step involves conducting a thorough assessment of the present circumstances. This entails identifying the strengths and weaknesses inherent in existing sources of financing. Such an evaluation encompasses an analysis of financial statements, cash flow projections, and credit terms. The overarching objective is to ascertain the prevailing capital costs, debt levels, and liquidity position.
2. Setting objectives
The second phase in optimizing a company's capital structure revolves around establishing goals that harmonize with the strategic objectives and risk profile of the organization. This entails conducting a comprehensive evaluation of diverse scenarios and meticulously assessing the trade-offs between debt and equity options.
3. Implementing measures
The third step is to implement an action plan that guides the company from the current situation to the goal. This may involve various measures:
- Repayment of debts or refinancing
- Increase or decrease in equity
- Optimization of working capital
- Sale of assets or M&A
4. Risk management
The fourth step involves managing risks and opportunities that may arise from the new capital structure.
Risks may include:
- Interest rate risks
- Credit risks
- Covenants
- Refinancing risks
Opportunities may include:
- Lower capital costs through diversification of total capital
- Higher profitability through leverage effects
- Improved competitive position enabling strategic investments
Optimal capital structure continues to evolve
The fundamental tenets of a robust capital structure remain consistent across all companies: it should embody resilience, flexibility, and alignment with organizational objectives. However, the dynamics of the capital stack and how companies interact with it are contingent upon their stage of development and business model.
In the early stages, companies encounter limitations in shaping their capital structure. Securing debt capital proves challenging, compelling them to primarily rely on venture capital and other forms of risk financing.
Yet, as they progress and attain further growth milestones, avenues for diversification emerge. With maturity comes an enhanced ability to shape the capital structure to better suit evolving needs.
Traditionally, "asset-light" companies have grappled with hurdles in diversifying their capital structure due to the intangible nature of their assets. However, recent years have witnessed a transformative shift. Emerging debt providers have pioneered risk assessment methodologies capable of appraising intangible assets as viable collateral.
Consequently, particularly in sectors like technology, digital services, and Software as a Service (SaaS), these companies now enjoy improved access to debt capital.
Here is a summary and a Q&A to sum up the topic around capital structure:
Summary: capital structure
Capital structure is the balance of debt and equity a company uses for funding. Traditionally, asset-heavy companies secure debt more easily, while asset-light businesses rely on equity due to limited collateral. However, evolving risk assessments and alternative financing now provide asset-light firms with earlier access to debt. This shift allows tech companies to diversify funding sources, reduce capital costs, and optimize financial flexibility. By strategically adjusting their capital structure based on growth stages and market conditions, companies can enhance stability, attract investors, and improve long-term profitability while balancing risk and opportunity in their financial strategy.
What is meant by capital structure?
Capital Structure refers to the combination of different sources of funds that a company uses to finance its operations and investments. It includes equity (such as common and preferred stock) and debt (such as loans and bonds), which are detailed in a company's balance sheet The proportion of debt and equity in a company's capital structure is crucial because it affects the company's financial health, risk profile, and cost of capital.
What is an example of a capital structure?
Here are some examples of capital structures used by well-known companies:
1. Apple Inc.
- Capital Structure: Hybrid, with a mix of debt and equity.
- Strategy: Apple uses retained earnings and strategic debt financing for share buybacks and dividend payouts, benefiting from low-interest rates while maintaining profitability..
- Benefits: This approach allows Apple to minimize risk, maximize shareholder value, and maintain financial flexibility.
2. Tesla Inc.
- Capital Structure: Heavily reliant on equity financing, especially during its early years.
- Strategy: Tesla has used equity financing to fund research and development and growth initiatives, reducing financial risk during its high-growth phase.
- Benefits: This approach has enabled Tesla to pursue ambitious expansion plans and invest in innovation.
3. Coca-Cola Company
- Capital Structure: Balanced, combining debt and equity financing.
- Strategy: Coca-Cola maintains a solid credit rating to access low-cost debt capital, supporting long-term growth objectives while preserving shareholder value.
- Benefits: This balanced approach allows Coca-Cola to finance operations and acquisitions sustainably.
What are the four theories of capital structure?
- Modigliani-Miller Theorem (MM Theory): Proposes that in perfect markets with no taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs, or asymmetric information, the value of a firm is unaffected by how it is financed. Capital structure is irrelevant to firm value.
- Agency Cost Theory: Focuses on how capital structure can help mitigate conflicts of interest between shareholders, managers, and debtholders. Debt can discipline managers but also create conflicts between shareholders and debt holders.
- Trade-off Theory: Suggests firms balance the benefits of debt (tax shields) against the costs of financial distress. Companies seek an optimal debt-to-equity ratio that maximizes firm value by trading off these advantages and disadvantages.
- Pecking Order Theory: Argues that firms prefer internal financing over external financing, and debt over equity when external financing is required. This preference hierarchy exists due to information asymmetry between managers and investors.
What is the formula of capital structure?
The formula for capital structure is typically represented as the ratio of a company's debt to equity. The most common way to express it is:
Capital structure = Debt / Equity
Where:
- Debt refers to the total amount of a company's liabilities (both short-term and long-term).
- Equity refers to the shareholders' equity, which is the difference between the company's total assets and total liabilities.
This ratio is used to assess the financial leverage of a company and helps to understand how a company finances its operations through debt versus equity.
Alternatively, some may look at capital structure in terms of the proportion of debt and equity in the company's total capital:
- Debt Ratio = Total Debt / (Total Debt + Equity)
- Equity Ratio = Equity / (Total Debt + Equity)
Interested in your funding scenario?
Get access to re:cap and calculate your funding terms or talk to one of our experts to find out how we can help you with our tailored debt funding.
Calculate your funding terms